Date: Wed, 27 Sep 1995 17:02:39 -0500 From: "Dennis R. Preston" Subject: Re: candy bars and measurements Thanks Kate. PayDay is the abomination I remember, but, as you note, we called it a candy bar (in spite of its lack of chocolate), and that was my point. I continue (obviously) to have my own opinion about whether any of them were 'fabulously delicious. Dennis Preston >At 8:10 AM 9/27/95 -0500, Dennis R. Preston wrote: > >>In the dim past, before I discovered Cabernet Savignon, I ate candy bars. I >>remember eating one horror called a 'Baby Ruth.' It had an (UGH!) peanut >>covering and, as I recall, no chocolate at all. > >I beg to differ. Baby Ruths are covered in chocolate, and, as I recall, are >fabulously delicious. The one covered in peanuts is a Pay Day, and when you >have it for breakfast along with a Diet Dr. Depper in graduate school it >allows you the illusion that you're getting a little protein. > >I would describe a Pay Day as a candy bar, despite its chococatelessness. > >Kate Catmull kate[AT SYMBOL GOES HERE]