Date: Mon, 28 Oct 1996 10:24:53 -0800

From: Peter McGraw pmcgraw[AT SYMBOL GOES HERE]CALVIN.LINFIELD.EDU

Subject: Re: American epenthetic "r"



On Fri, 25 Oct 1996, Donald M. Lance wrote:





But I did think of Tom Murray's data in THE LANGUAGE OF ST LOUIS,

MISSOURI: VARIATION IN THE GATEWAY CITY (Peter Lang, 1968). Murray cites

interesting local evidence: signs in laundromats (p. 17). In one case, a

"would-be grammarian" corrected a sign saying "warsher don't work" by

changing the verb to "doesn't" with no indication that the correctionist

found anything amiss in the identity of the machine that didn't work.

Murray has a table (p. 18) summarizing data he collected in St Louis:



That's interesting, since it indicates that the anonymous "correctionist"

was aware of the r even to the point of assuming it should be reflected in

spelling. I heard anecdotal evidence of the opposite from a fellow grad

student years ago. This colleague, who was from Kansas, told of remarking

to an acquaintance that the acquaintance must also be from Kansas since

she used an r in "warsh." "R?!!" replied the other woman in perplexity.

"There's no r in 'warsh'!"



Peter McGraw

Linfield College

McMinnville, OR





Table 3

CONDITIONED VARIATION OF INTRUSIVE r

(as in 'wash')



context in which heard

socio-econ class informal midformal formal

% no. % no. % no.

upper 83 1446 68 1185 39 669

middle 92 1657 76 1369 52 937

lower 99 1766 82 1463 68 1213



It is interesting that this phonological bit of Americana, known by

dialectologists as an Ohio Valley phenomenon (but not limited to this

area), is also thought by someone to exist to some extent (primarily?) in

CA, OR, ID. My students from St. Louis would always mention this "awful"

pronunciation when I would ask about features of St Louis speech; they hung

their heads in shame for not being to erase it from their phonological

systems -- only they thought it was a feature of a single lexical item

rather than a phonological rule in their heads/behavior. I've always

suspected it was more widespread than limited dialectological reports have

suggested. When the last volume of DARE comes out we'll probably get a

nice map and a better answer than we had before.