Date: Tue, 27 Jan 1998 19:38:56 -0500
From: Beverly Flanigan FLANIGAN[AT SYMBOL GOES HERE]OUVAXA.CATS.OHIOU.EDU
Subject: Re: Sexgate explained; ADS-L again
Correction, Mr. Popik: Your etymological research is perfectly
legitimate; some items interest me, and some don't, but they are not
outside the domain of the ADS, and you do not NOT belong on the list.
Read again what Tim and I commented on: The little made-up dialogues
add gratuitous (and, to some of us, tasteless) humor to an otherwise
quite acceptable report on -gate words and other etymologies.