Date: Tue, 10 Jan 1995 07:58:28 -0600
From: Natalie Maynor maynor[AT SYMBOL GOES HERE]RA.MSSTATE.EDU
Subject: Words of the Year
I think we need to keep emphasizing that the Words of the Year are not
usually new words and possibly remove the word "newly" from "newly
prominent." I remember last year having to respond to lots of ridicule
of ADS as being "way behind the times." It's starting again this year.
Somebody forwarded Allan's press-release posting to Words-L this morning,
where it has already gotten one response:
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 1995 07:03:45 CST
Sender: English Language Discussion Group WORDS-L[AT SYMBOL GOES HERE]uga.cc.uga.edu
From: Tushar Samant samant[AT SYMBOL GOES HERE]CS.UCHICAGO.EDU
Subject: Re: Let the word go out
To: Multiple recipients of list WORDS-L WORDS-L[AT SYMBOL GOES HERE]UGA.CC.UGA.EDU
All those words are for *94*?
Where the hell have they been?