Date: Sat, 3 Feb 1996 17:00:40 -0600 From: Natalie Maynor Subject: Bounced Mail **************************************************************** REMINDER: WHEN INCLUDING A PREVIOUS LIST POSTING IN SOMETHING YOU'RE SENDING TO THE LIST, BE SURE TO EDIT OUT ALL REFERENCES TO ADS-L IN THE HEADERS. **************************************************************** > Date: Fri, 2 Feb 1996 23:12:43 -0500 > From: "L-Soft list server at UGA (1.8b)" > Subject: ADS-L: error report from GROVE.IUP.EDU > >The enclosed message, found in the ADS-L mailbox and shown under the spool ID >8319 in the system log, has been identified as a possible delivery error notice >for the following reason: "Sender:", "From:" or "Reply-To:" field pointing to >the list has been found in mail body. > > ------------------ Message in error (70 lines) -------------------------- > Date: Fri, 02 Feb 1996 21:16:08 -0500 (EST) > From: BARBARA HILL HUDSON > Subject: Re: Fork and Knife? Knife and Fork? > Organization: Indiana University of Pennsylvania > > Subj: RE: Fork and Knife? Knife and Fork? > > I (family from Florida, have lived in NJ, Chicago, Texas, NY, Washington, DC > and Western PA) have always said "knife and fork." But I say both "shoes and > socks" and "socks and shoes." I think I use the latter when talking little > children, and I am unconsciously stressing the "proper" order for putting them > on. > Barbara > bhhudson[AT SYMBOL GOES HERE]grove.iup.edu > > > For me, it has always been "knife and fork", never the other way round. > In fact "fork and knife" sounds about as unnatural as "socks and shoes". > > Allen > maberry[AT SYMBOL GOES HERE]u.washington.edu > > On Fri, 2 Feb 1996, Kathleen M. O'Neill wrote: > > > I have a question which is, admittedly, > > a bit mundane for the likes of the > > great intellectuals on this list, > > but, darn it, there's a bet ridin' on it! > > > > Has any work been done on a regional distribution > > of usages of "fork and knife" vs. "knife and fork"? > > > > A few colleagues of mine claim that they use > > "knife and fork" and the other variety seems strange. > > Another colleague uses "fork and knife" and says, > > to him, the other usage sounds, in his word, "British." > > > > Any insights, observations, or anecdotes are welcome, > > and you may forward them to me personally, if you like. > > I'll post a summary if the information warrants it. > > > > Thanks in advance! > > > > ;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;; > > ;Kathleen M. O'Neill ... Language Laboratory Technician I ; > > ;koneil1[AT SYMBOL GOES HERE]uic.edu ... u55354[AT SYMBOL GOES HERE]uicvm.cc.uic.edu ; > > ;:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::; > > ;University of Illinois at Chicago ... Language Laboratory ; > > ;703 South Morgan Street (M/C 042) ... Grant Hall, Room 311 ; > > ;Chicago, IL 60607-7025 ; > > ;312.996.8838 or 8836 ... 312.996.5501 FAX ; > > ;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;; > >