Date: Fri, 25 Feb 1994 13:11:25 -0600 From: Natalie Maynor Subject: Re: Phonetic/Phonemic E-Mail Alphabet > But, Bill, I was thinking of something that could be read--i.e., simple > substitutions like [AT SYMBOL GOES HERE] for schwa, & for ash, etc. I've had copies of the set of substitutions used in phonetic discussions on sci.lang (on usenet) but am not sure I have a copy online right now. Some people seem to think that these symbols are universally known and used on the net. Our discussion right now is a pretty good indication that that's not the case. --Natalie (maynor[AT SYMBOL GOES HERE]