Date: Tue, 28 Feb 1995 20:53:42 -0500
From: "Peter L. Patrick" PPATRICK[AT SYMBOL GOES HERE]GUVAX.BITNET
Subject: Re: Long time, no see
Readers interested in further sources on Chinese Pidgin English who
wish to consult reliable modern linguistic works might investigate:
Robert Hall (Jr., by the way) 1944, "Chinese Pidgin English grammar
and texts" in JAOS 64: 95-113 (Jrl of the Am. Oriental Soc.);
Philip Baker 1987, "Historical developments in Chinese Pidgin
English...", Jrl. of Pidgin & Creole Languages 2(2): 163-207.
The pidgin was used in coastal California into the 19th century, and
in Hong Kong until more recently (see K. K. Luke & J. C. Richards
1982, "English in Hong Kong: functions and status", English World-Wide
John Holm gives a brief summary of what is known (very
little having been written) in his standard reference work 'Pidgins
and Creoles', vol. 2.
There has been a great deal learned about pidgins in general
since the earlier works cited in previous messages and it would be
surprising if they were entirely up-to-date in their attributions.
The most detailed and careful work has been published in
German by w. Bisang (1985, 'Das chinesische pidgin-englisch', U. of
Amsterdam Area Studies no. 58) and A. Bauer (1975, 'Das Kanton-
Englisch:...' Frankfort, Peter Lang).
As noted before on the list, some usages commonly attributed
to CPE are indeed relexified Chinese ("look-see" being simply Chinese
'kan-jian', "no can do" = 'bu ke-yi', "chop-chop" Cant. 'chop-chop'
for "quickly"), but others which are said to be so are not so simple,
as Hall pointed out elsewhere ("Pidgin English and linguistic change",
1952, Lingua 3: 138-146).
More needs to be done on CPE and its connection with both other
Pacific English- and Portuguese-related pidgins and creoles.